Groupthink essay

This in turn leads to a spiral of ignorance and superstition that is not easily circumvented" p. Antecedent Conditions Janis defined the Groupthink essay conditions of groupthink as characteristics of the group that foster a consensus-seeking tendency. The group Groupthink essay not realistically or seriously consider outside information or other potential decision alternatives.

From these six case Groupthink essay, Janis developed a tri-partite model of the groupthink phenomenon. He states, "How can groupthink be prevented? How could bright, shrewd men like John F. As Turner and Pratkanis conclude, "the unconditional acceptance Groupthink essay the groupthink phenomenon without due regard for the body of scientific evidence surrounding it leads to unthinking conformity to a theoretical standpoint that may be invalid for the majority of circumstances.

Defective decision-making normally lowers the probability of a successful decision outcome Box E. Unlock This Study Guide Now Start your hour free trial to unlock this page Groupthink study guide and get instant access to the following: The groupthink tendency is expressed in the observable consequences of the symptoms of groupthink Box C.

It is precisely because groupthink achieved this success despite a lack of evidence in support of the theory. Overestimation of the Group 1.

Despite its popularity however, researchers have had difficulty empirically verifying the theory. The value of groupthink is that it helps explain one factor that could lower the probability of a successful decision outcome.

Of all the antecedent conditions in his model, Janis emphasized group cohesiveness most. Symptoms of Groupthink The consensus-seeking tendency resulting from the antecedent conditions led to what Janis referred to as the symptoms of groupthink. This makes groupthink an important area of exploration for business management research concerning decision-making.

In turn, these factors contribute to defective decision making by the group. Groupthink does not always result in a bad decision.

Illusion of Invulnerability This symptom is defined as excessive optimism that encourages taking extreme risks with little consideration of what would happen if the worst outcome should occur or the consequences of the solution proposed by the group.

Working in groups provide several advantages such as more knowledge, the ability to generate more ideas, longer and more accurate memories, and better evaluation of concepts, opinions, and courses of action.

He described it as the "central theme of my analysis" and wrote, "the more amiability and esprit de corps among the members of a policy-making in-group, the greater is the danger that independent critical thinking will be replaced by groupthink, which is likely to result in irrational and dehumanizing actions directed against out-groups" p.

Janis states, "The main theme of this book occurred to me while reading Arthur M.

As McCauley states, "The success of the groupthink model is a phenomenon worth attention in its own right" p. Group pressures and norms make it clear that dissenting viewpoints and behavior are contrary to expected group norms of loyalty.

Belief in the Inherent Morality of the Group This symptom implies that the group ignores the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions. This always includes the overestimation of the potential success of the solution or the abilities of the group.


I began to wonder whether some kind of psychological contagion…had interfered with their mental alertness" p. Eight main symptoms run through the case studies of historic fiascoes" Janis,p.

Groupthink is a theory purporting the dangers of consensus-seeking in the absence of evidence, and yet it seems to have become a victim of the very thing it warns against.

One cannot assume that groupthink is the cause of practically every miscalculation or poor decision reached by a group. Groupthink theory offers insight into understanding how various factors and conditions combine to affect decision outcomes. Groupthink Theory It is arguably as important to understand the way in which groupthink theory was developed as it is to understand the theory itself.

The theory predicts that when a group is moderately or highly cohesive Box Athe more of Groupthink essay antecedent conditions listed in boxes B-1 and B-2 that are present, the greater the chances of defective decision making as a result of the groupthink syndrome.Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more.

Get started now! Definition We will write a custom essay sample on Groupthink or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Janis defines groupthink as “a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when members strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically [ ].

Communication Theories: Group Think Essay - Groupthink is an attractive theory by the virtue of its ability to explain irrational decisions made by rational and intelligent groups of individuals.

However, the theory does not predict group behavior and merely reexamines past events and applies a rubric of eight “symptoms” that comprise. Groupthink Essay - Groupthink What is groupthink.

There is a simple definition for it, but is it truly that simple. The term groupthink refers to the inclination of group members to have the same opinions and beliefs; it frequently leads to mistakes.

It often occurs without an individual being aware of it. Groupthink Essay Groupthink is a concept that was identified by Irving Janis that refers to faulty decision-making in a group.

Groupthink Research Paper Starter

Groups experiencing groupthink do not consider all alternatives and they desire unanimity at the expense of quality decisions. Jun 04,  · Check out our top Free Essays on Groupthink to help you write your own Essay.

Groupthink essay
Rated 0/5 based on 43 review